French authorities reportedly have suspended their insistence on special labelling for West Bank products following a lawsuit alleging that the practice is discriminatory.
The France office of Amnesty International complained about the suspension in a statement Wednesday.
“Instead of complying with the request to end imports [from the West Bank], the government has chosen to roll back and suspend the demand for labelling,” the human rights group wrote.
The Israel Broadcasting Corp., or Kan, reported independently on Tuesday about the suspension of the measure, which was adopted in 2016.
That year, the French Economy Ministry’s General Directorate for Competition, Consumption and Fraud Prevention published an advisory circular requiring retailers to use the word “colonies,” French for “settlements,” to specify goods originating in Israeli settlements in the Golan Heights, the West Bank and eastern Jerusalem, which Israel captured in 1967.
Israel considers the Golan and all of Jerusalem an integral part of its territory, as well as the West Bank disputed land where most Jewish settlements are legal municipal entities. But much of the world, including the European Union and its member states, views the land as occupied and the settlements as illegal.
In 2015, the European Commission adopted binding regulations requiring such labelling. However, the commission has no recourse against countries that do not apply the regulations and no lawsuit has been brought to date against a vendor who declined to apply them. France’s major supermarket chains apply no special labelling for settlement goods. Israel has vocally protested the passing of these regulations.
Earlier this year The Lawfare Project, a pro-Israel think tank, initiated a legal action challenging the labelling requirements on behalf of Psagot Winery LTD, an Israeli vineyard whose European distributors are subject to the labelling rules.
In France, the legal action in May prompted the Council of State, which is the government’s legal adviser, to ask the European Court of Justice for its opinion on the legal status of labelling.