A senior government minister has challenged Jeremy Corbyn to “explain why you defend the world’s oldest hatred”, in a debate on anti-Semitism in parliament.
Sajid Javid, Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government, took to Twitter to say “enough is enough Jeremy Corbyn”, as calls mount for Corbyn to explain why he questioned the planned removal of an anti-Semitic mural.
Taking to Twitter, Javid said: “I’m going to ask for a debate in Parliament on anti-semitism in coming weeks. I challenge you [Jeremy Corbyn] to turn up and personally speak for the Opposition. Your opportunity to explain why you defend the world’s oldest hatred”
This comes after Jewish News discovered that at least half a dozen MPs have already contacted parliamentary Labour Party chair John Cryer amid a furious reaction, with more expected to do so.
At least half a dozen MPs have already contacted parliamentary Labour Party chair John Cryer amid a furious reaction, with more expected to do so.
On Saturday, Jeremy Corbyn said he regrets not looking more carefully at an allegedly anti-Semitic image before giving his apparent support to the artist responsible for it.
Enough is enough @jeremycorbyn. I’m going to ask for a debate in Parliament on anti-semitism in coming weeks. I challenge you to turn up and personally speak for the Opposition. Your opportunity to explain why you defend the world’s oldest hatred https://t.co/3heIruVBo6
— Sajid Javid (@sajidjavid) March 23, 2018
The Labour leader was challenged by some of his own MPs over his response to a Facebook post by the street artist Mear One about the plan to paint over the work.
Mr Corbyn’s response suggested the artist was “in good company” because the Rockefeller family had covered over a mural featuring Lenin in their New York development.
In his post responding to the imminent destruction of the mural, Mr Corbyn said: “Why? You are in good company. Rockerfeller (sic) destroyed Diego Viera’s mural because it includes a picture of Lenin.”
- Sadiq Khan turns up heat on Corbyn: Labour anti-Semitism ‘depressing, saddening and unacceptable’
- Corbyn siding with anti-Semites rather than Jews, say community leaders
- Jewish leaders refuse to meet Corbyn as relations reach new low
- Jeremy Corbyn: I’m sincerely sorry for pain and hurt caused by ant-Semitism
- OPINION: Jews on the left deserve better than this sorry mess
But Mr Corbyn has now acknowledged he should have looked more closely at the image before posting on Facebook.
He said: “In 2012 I made a general comment about the removal of public art on grounds of freedom of speech. My comment referred to the destruction of the mural Man at the Crossroads by Diego Rivera on the Rockefeller Center.
“That is in no way comparable with the mural in the original post. I sincerely regret that I did not look more closely at the image I was commenting on, the contents of which are deeply disturbing and anti-Semitic.
“I wholeheartedly support its removal.
“I am opposed to the production of anti-Semitic material of any kind, and the defence of free speech cannot be used as a justification for the promotion of anti-Semitism in any form. That is a view I’ve always held.”
The statement from Mr Corbyn came after a backlash against his initial response, issued through a spokesman.
“In 2012, Jeremy was responding to concerns about the removal of public art on grounds of freedom of speech,” the spokesman said.
“However, the mural was offensive, used anti-Semitic imagery, which has no place in our society, and it is right that it was removed.”
Labour MP Luciana Berger – who highlighted the post by Mr Corbyn – hit out at the “wholly inadequate” response.
She said: “It fails to understand on any level the hurt and anguish felt about anti-Semitism. I will be raising this further.”
Speaking to Jewish News, Wes Streeting, Labour MP for Ilford North said: “There is no reasonable or plausible explanation for this antisemitic artwork. It cannot be justified.
“A number of Labour MPs, including myself, have raised concerns with the Leader’s Office. To say that the initial response from the spokesperson – and the subsequent explanation from Jeremy Corbyn – are both insufficient would be an understatement, but it does reflect the careless and hopeless attitude towards tackling antisemitism that we’ve consistently seen from the top of the party.
“Silence is complicity, which is why I will continue to challenge antisemitism within the Labour Party, including those who choose to dismiss concerns or look the other way, regardless of threats of deselection or abuse on social media. When it comes to antisemitism, the alt-left is beginning to smell a lot like alt-right.”
The Jewish Labour Movement said: “Anti-Semitic art is anti-Semitism.
“History is littered with imagery that has reaffirmed the worst kinds of racial stereotypes and led to the worst kinds of racial discrimination.
“It cannot be defended under any circumstances. Not by anyone and least of all the leader of the Labour Party.”
The mural, in east London, was painted by Mear One – whose real name is Kalen Ockerman – and depicted a group of businessmen playing a Monopoly-style game on a board balanced on the backs of people.
The artist denied being anti-Semitic, saying the mural is about “class and privilege” and contains a group of bankers “made up of Jewish and white Anglos”.