OPINION: Vilification of the EU Court for ruling on Hamas was ill-informed
By Gabriel Webber, a youth worker for LJY-Netzer, the youth movement of Liberal Judaism, which he represents as an elected member of the Board of Deputies. He writes in a personal capacity.
Hamas is a terrorist organisation. Specifically, it makes a habit of committing criminal acts, including against civilians, with the intent to cause death, with the purpose of provoking a state of terror in the general public and compelling a government to do or to abstain from doing certain acts, which is how the UN defines terrorism.
So, how come the Court of Justice of the European Union was able to order such an organisation to be removed from the EU list of terrorist groups?
If you look at Twitter and Facebook you could be forgiven for getting the impression that the EU has just found Hamas to be an honourable organisation, and that its judges hates Jews.
These are ill-informed slurs.
British people seem to have a real problem with reporting legal rulings correctly.
It is all too common to vilify the decision-taker without having a clue about the evidence or the legal issues.
The European Court of Human Rights is the most obvious example, but it also happened prominently with the Mark Duggan inquest last year: the press went to town arguing that the ‘lawful killing’ verdict was “wrong”, but how many commentators heard the several weeks’ worth of evidence that the jury did?
The Hamas judgment is admittedly not a joy to read. It’s full of dense legal prose and it doesn’t help that it refers to European laws by number rather than by name. But I managed to wade through it, and the upshot is: the court has not ruled that Hamas aren’t terrorists.
What they said was that the decision to classify them as terrorists did not follow the proper procedure.
Specifically, decisions to classify groups as terrorist organisations must state their reasoning. This is only fair in a democratic system where political groups are being banned, and chimes with halacha – which requires batei din to provide written reasons for their decisions when there are likely to be doubts about the integrity of the process.
Sadly, when the European Commission proscribed Hamas, their reasoning was not precise enough.
It was, the court says, “a general and stereotypical formulation” based on the plain definition of terrorism – along the lines of the first paragraph of this article – and did not contain specific factual evidence to show that Hamas engages in terrorism.
When the Commission can put this evidence together, which seems unlikely to take too much effort, Hamas can go back on the banned list.
I think there are three messages to take from this.
The first point is that, fortunately for us, the Court of Justice of the European Union did not make its ruling this week because it hates Jews.
The second is that everyone benefits from a fair and impartial legal system. The Maharal of Prague wrote, “That we sometimes free guilty people is not significant. What is critical is preserving justice.” The European Commission was lazy with its reasoning so its decision was overturned, and just as well because what if their lack of evidence had actually perpetrated an injustice against an innocent organisation? It could have done unless the courts had the power to reverse it.
The third is about informed decision-taking. The banning of Hamas was a sensible decision – because they are plainly terrorists – but not an informed one, because it did not demonstrate sufficient evidence.
The vilification, by some parts of the Jewish community, of the EU Court for ruling that Hamas isn’t a terrorist group, was not properly informed either. It was a slur thrown about by people who hadn’t read the judgment and who didn’t understand the issues.
Acting before one has the facts is never a good plan, as hopefully this saga has reinforced for everybody.
Thank you for helping to make Jewish News the leading source of news and opinion for the UK Jewish community. Today we're asking for your invaluable help to continue putting our community first in everything we do.
For as little as £5 a month you can help sustain the vital work we do in celebrating and standing up for Jewish life in Britain.
Jewish News holds our community together and keeps us connected. Like a synagogue, it’s where people turn to feel part of something bigger. It also proudly shows the rest of Britain the vibrancy and rich culture of modern Jewish life.
You can make a quick and easy one-off or monthly contribution of £5, £10, £20 or any other sum you’re comfortable with.
100% of your donation will help us continue celebrating our community, in all its dynamic diversity...
Engaging
Being a community platform means so much more than producing a newspaper and website. One of our proudest roles is media partnering with our invaluable charities to amplify the outstanding work they do to help us all.
Celebrating
There’s no shortage of oys in the world but Jewish News takes every opportunity to celebrate the joys too, through projects like Night of Heroes, 40 Under 40 and other compelling countdowns that make the community kvell with pride.
Pioneering
In the first collaboration between media outlets from different faiths, Jewish News worked with British Muslim TV and Church Times to produce a list of young activists leading the way on interfaith understanding.
Campaigning
Royal Mail issued a stamp honouring Holocaust hero Sir Nicholas Winton after a Jewish News campaign attracted more than 100,000 backers. Jewish Newsalso produces special editions of the paper highlighting pressing issues including mental health and Holocaust remembrance.
Easy access
In an age when news is readily accessible, Jewish News provides high-quality content free online and offline, removing any financial barriers to connecting people.
Voice of our community to wider society
The Jewish News team regularly appears on TV, radio and on the pages of the national press to comment on stories about the Jewish community. Easy access to the paper on the streets of London also means Jewish News provides an invaluable window into the community for the country at large.
We hope you agree all this is worth preserving.
