Labour refutes expelled activist Marc Wadsworth’s claim of support from Corbyn
Left-wing campaigner claims the Labour leader did not believe he had done anything wrong to warrant discipline
Labour has refuted claims that an activist expelled from the party for verbally clashing with an MP had backing from the party leader
Marc Wadsworth said he had received “behind the scenes” support from the Labour leader’s office during his disciplinary hearing – a claim denied by sources close to Mr Corbyn.
Mr Wadsworth’s expulsion followed a hearing by Labour’s disciplinary body which found his behaviour had been “grossly detrimental to the party”.
But the veteran activist claimed Mr Corbyn had told mutual friends “he doesn’t see that I did anything wrong”.
Mr Corbyn’s office disputed Mr Wadsworth’s account and insisted no member of staff had called to offer him support.
A source said a call was however made by a member of Labour staff to one of Mr Wadsworth’s supporters to reduce the risk of “incidents” outside the disciplinary hearing, which began on Wednesday.
According to a Labour source, Mr Wadsworth then made clear he was “unhappy” that Mr Corbyn had not supported him or responded to attempts to contact him.
The Labour leader’s office dispute this, saying no member of staff offered him support, nor did Wadsworth claim support from Corbyn during his NCC hearing.
Following his expulsion, Board of Deputies president Jonathan Arkush said it was the “right result and is a step in the right direction”.
Since our meeting with Jeremy Corbyn, the party has pledged to deal with all of the outstanding cases by our next meeting in July 2018, including high profile cases like Ken Livingstone and Jackie Walker. We will be keeping a close eye on this.”
For now, we express our admiration for and solidarity with Ruth Smeeth MP who has had to endure the most revolting antisemitism for far too long and gave evidence at the hearing. Enough is Enough.”
Ivor Caplin of the Jewish Labour Movement said they “welcome the decision to expel Marc Wadsworth. This case, dating back to the very day of the Chakrabarti Inquiry launch, is symptomatic of the ongoing delays in resolving disciplinary matters. We now need to see sustained action by the Party and the Leadership, including on Ken Livingstone and Jackie Walker.”
Mr Wadsworth had accused Jewish MP Ruth Smeeth of “working hand in hand” with The Daily Telegraph during a tirade at the launch of the Chakrabarti report on anti-Semitism in 2016.
Mr Wadsworth hit out at the disciplinary process used against him and claimed he had been made a scapegoat.
He said: “The first letter I got, cancelling my membership summarily, was based on an alleged verbal attack on a member of the Parliamentary Labour Party which was uncomradely, brought the party into disrepute and embarrassed the leader.
“Well, the leader has told mutual friends he wasn’t embarrassed because he doesn’t see that I did anything wrong.”
Asked if Mr Corbyn’s office had been supporting his case, Mr Wadsworth said: “When they called me on the first day of the hearing, they said to me that they had been working behind the scenes, that what I said wasn’t anti-Semitic.”
He acknowledged Mr Corbyn “did have a bit of a go at me” at the time of the incident and said “perhaps I could have used kinder language”.
Asked who from Mr Corbyn’s team had been in touch with him on the first day of the disciplinary hearing, Mr Wadsworth said: “I’m not going to get into names.”
Mr Wadsworth said the claims against him changed from the “verbal attack” to one of “anti-Semitism under the IHRA (International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance) definition, which the party apparently had adopted later on, after, and were applying retrospectively”.
He claimed he had been the victim of a “purge” and said “some people have called it a kangaroo court”.
Ms Smeeth said she was relieved that the “ordeal” was over.
Stoke-on-Trent North MP Ms Smeeth said: “Abuse, bullying and intimidation have no place in our movement, as today’s announcement has proven.
“I hope that this decision represents the first step towards a return to the values of decency and respect throughout the Labour Party.”
Dozens of Labour MPs had marched in support of Jewish colleague Ms Smeeth as she prepared to give evidence at Mr Wadsworth’s disciplinary hearing this week.
But Mr Wadsworth accused the “gang of white MPs” of bullying behaviour, saying it was “a crude attempt to influence the outcome of my hearing, and it seems to have had an effect”.
A Labour spokesman said: “The National Constitutional Committee (NCC) of the Labour Party has found that two charges of a breach of the Labour Party’s rule 2.1.8 by Marc Wadsworth have been proven.
“The NCC consequently determined that the sanction for this breach of Labour Party rules will be expulsion from membership.”
The decision on Mr Wadsworth came as Ken Livingstone – who is currently suspended from Labour over remarks linking Adolf Hitler and Zionism – told LBC rows over anti-Semitism in the party are a “complete diversion” in the run-up to the local elections.
Mr Livingstone avoided expulsion in April at a disciplinary hearing into his conduct but was suspended for a further year.
One of the flashpoints at a meeting between Mr Corbyn and Jewish leaders over anti-Semitism in Labour was the party’s handling of the former MP’s case.
The attempt to smooth relations with the community backfired for the Labour leader as leaders of the Board of Deputies of British Jews and Jewish Leadership Council (JLC) accused him of failing to back his words with action.
Labour said 90 current cases of anti-Semitism are under investigation, making up around 0.02% of Labour’s membership of around 500,000.
Over the past three years, a total of 300 complaints have been made over anti-Semitism, around half of which had led to people being expelled from or leaving the party.
Thank you for helping to make Jewish News the leading source of news and opinion for the UK Jewish community. Today we're asking for your invaluable help to continue putting our community first in everything we do.
For as little as £5 a month you can help sustain the vital work we do in celebrating and standing up for Jewish life in Britain.
Jewish News holds our community together and keeps us connected. Like a synagogue, it’s where people turn to feel part of something bigger. It also proudly shows the rest of Britain the vibrancy and rich culture of modern Jewish life.
You can make a quick and easy one-off or monthly contribution of £5, £10, £20 or any other sum you’re comfortable with.
100% of your donation will help us continue celebrating our community, in all its dynamic diversity...
Engaging
Being a community platform means so much more than producing a newspaper and website. One of our proudest roles is media partnering with our invaluable charities to amplify the outstanding work they do to help us all.
Celebrating
There’s no shortage of oys in the world but Jewish News takes every opportunity to celebrate the joys too, through projects like Night of Heroes, 40 Under 40 and other compelling countdowns that make the community kvell with pride.
Pioneering
In the first collaboration between media outlets from different faiths, Jewish News worked with British Muslim TV and Church Times to produce a list of young activists leading the way on interfaith understanding.
Campaigning
Royal Mail issued a stamp honouring Holocaust hero Sir Nicholas Winton after a Jewish News campaign attracted more than 100,000 backers. Jewish Newsalso produces special editions of the paper highlighting pressing issues including mental health and Holocaust remembrance.
Easy access
In an age when news is readily accessible, Jewish News provides high-quality content free online and offline, removing any financial barriers to connecting people.
Voice of our community to wider society
The Jewish News team regularly appears on TV, radio and on the pages of the national press to comment on stories about the Jewish community. Easy access to the paper on the streets of London also means Jewish News provides an invaluable window into the community for the country at large.
We hope you agree all this is worth preserving.
