Ex-Labour staffer asks court to reveal who leaked internal antisemitism report

The latest Jewish News

Read this week’s digital edition

Click Here

Ex-Labour staffer asks court to reveal who leaked internal antisemitism report

Emilie Oldknow, the party's former director of governance, wants to bring claims for defamation and misuse of private information over the leaking of the report

Labour leader Keir Starmer has sought to move the party beyond the row over antisemitism that marred much of his predecessor's tenure.
Labour leader Keir Starmer has sought to move the party beyond the row over antisemitism that marred much of his predecessor's tenure.

The Labour Party has “reached a clear view” about who leaked an internal report into allegations of antisemitism, lawyers representing a former senior staffer have told the High Court.

An 860-page report on Labour’s governance and legal unit, which found “no evidence” of antisemitism being handled differently from other complaints, was leaked in April last year.

The internal investigation carried out in the final months of Jeremy Corbyn’s leadership concluded that “factional opposition” towards the former leader contributed to “a litany of mistakes” hindering efforts to tackle the crisis.

The leaking of the dossier, which included emails and WhatsApp messages between several senior Labour officials, prompted new party leader Sir Keir Starmer to launch an inquiry.

Emilie Oldknow – Labour’s former director of governance, who is also married to shadow health secretary Jonathan Ashworth – wants to bring claims for defamation and misuse of private information over the leaking of the report, which contains more than 500 references to her.

At a remote hearing on Monday, her lawyers asked the High Court to grant an order requiring Labour to reveal who leaked the report so she can sue them.

William Bennett QC, representing Ms Oldknow, told the court that the report was a “politically-motivated hatchet job” which sought to blame Ms Oldknow and others for Labour’s “failure” to deal with allegations of antisemitism.

The report also accused Ms Oldknow and her colleagues of “undermining Jeremy Corbyn’s leadership”, Mr Bennett said.

He said the party decided the report “could not be submitted to the Equality and Human Rights Commission because it was deliberately misleading and relied on improperly obtained private correspondence”.

However, last April, “a faction within the Labour Party published the report to the media”, Mr Bennett said.

He told the court Ms Oldknow “wishes to bring those people to account, who anonymously, surreptitiously leaked the Labour Party report against the wishes of the Labour Party”.

Mr Bennett said in written submissions that Labour has “reached a clear view as to who was responsible for the leak”, but has “studiously avoided giving any explanation as to what happened”.

He said Ms Oldknow has “a strong case” to bring claims for defamation and misuse of private information against those who leaked the report.

But she “needs to know which wrongdoer played what role and whether there is a viable case against some or all of them”, Mr Bennett said.

Anya Proops QC, representing the Labour Party, said the leaked report, which “contained extensive quantities of personal data relating to a wide number of individuals, including Ms Oldknow”, was “highly confidential”.

She said in written submissions that Labour’s investigation into the leak is “now at an end” and that the party has concluded that “it did not authorise the leak and it is innocent of any responsibility”.

Ms Proops said Labour understood that Ms Oldknow’s application was “a necessary step” for her to be able to “vindicate her rights” following the leak.

She told the court: “We are entirely content to disclose to Ms Oldknow effectively the underlying information enabling her to identify the persons responsible for the leak.”

But Ms Proops said Labour did not want to “provide our subjective opinion on who is legally liable” for the leak.

She asked for the application to be adjourned, to ensure that “adequate protection is given to those third-party individuals who would be most seriously affected” if Ms Oldknow’s application was granted.

Five anonymous individuals who deny any responsibility of the leak were also represented at the hearing.

Their barrister Jacob Dean said in written submissions: “They have cooperated fully with the various investigations into that leak, providing detailed personal, private and confidential information to those investigations, on assurances of confidentiality.”

Mr Dean argued that “the potential for injustice is manifest” if Labour was forced to “disclose a mass of evidence… from which the (party) has drawn certain conclusions in order to allow the applicant to draw her own, possibly different, conclusions”.

He also said: “It is apparent that the (party) does not know who leaked the report.”

Mr Dean said Labour’s statement that it has “reached a clear view” as to who was responsible suggested that the party “does not have any direct or admissible evidence”.

The hearing before Mrs Justice Tipples is due to conclude on Monday and it is not yet known if she will give a ruling on this date or later.

Support your Jewish community. Support your Jewish News

Thank you for helping to make Jewish News the leading source of news and opinion for the UK Jewish community. Today we're asking for your invaluable help to continue putting our community first in everything we do.

Unlike other Jewish media, we do not charge for content. That won’t change. Because we are free, we rely on advertising to cover our costs. This vital lifeline, which has dropped in recent years, has fallen further due to coronavirus.

For as little as £5 a month you can help sustain the vital work we do in celebrating and standing up for Jewish life in Britain.

Jewish News holds our community together and keeps us connected. Like a synagogue, it’s where people turn to feel part of something bigger. It also proudly shows the rest of Britain the vibrancy and rich culture of modern Jewish life.

You can make a quick and easy one-off or monthly contribution of £5, £10, £20 or any other sum you’re comfortable with.

100% of your donation will help us continue celebrating our community, in all its dynamic diversity...


Being a community platform means so much more than producing a newspaper and website. One of our proudest roles is media partnering with our invaluable charities to amplify the outstanding work they do to help us all.


There’s no shortage of oys in the world but Jewish News takes every opportunity to celebrate the joys too, through projects like Night of Heroes, 40 Under 40 and other compelling countdowns that make the community kvell with pride.


In the first collaboration between media outlets from different faiths, Jewish News worked with British Muslim TV and Church Times to produce a list of young activists leading the way on interfaith understanding.


Royal Mail issued a stamp honouring Holocaust hero Sir Nicholas Winton after a Jewish News campaign attracted more than 100,000 backers. Jewish News also produces special editions of the paper highlighting pressing issues including mental health and Holocaust remembrance.

Easy access

In an age when news is readily accessible, Jewish News provides high-quality content free online and offline, removing any financial barriers to connecting people.

Voice of our community to wider society

The Jewish News team regularly appears on TV, radio and on the pages of the national press to comment on stories about the Jewish community. Easy access to the paper on the streets of London also means Jewish News provides an invaluable window into the community for the country at large.

We hope you agree all this is worth preserving.

read more: