Corbyn waits on result of defamation case brought by pro-Israel activist
search

The latest Jewish News

Read this week’s digital edition

Click Here

Corbyn waits on result of defamation case brought by pro-Israel activist

Former Labour leader is trying to overturn a High Court judge’s ruling after being sued by Richard Millett

Jeremy Corbyn speaking at the 2013 meeting, where he made the English irony remarks. Picture courtesy of the Daily Mail
Jeremy Corbyn speaking at the 2013 meeting, where he made the English irony remarks. Picture courtesy of the Daily Mail

Former Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn is waiting to hear whether he has won the latest round of a court fight with a political blogger.

Corbyn is trying to overturn a High Court judge’s ruling after being sued for defamation by Richard Millett.

He has mounted an appeal against preliminary findings made by Justice Saini.

Three appeal judges considered arguments at a Court of Appeal hearing in London on Tuesday and said they would announce their decision on a date to be fixed.

Lawyers representing Corbyn said the appeal raised “important and serious issues” about the right to freedom of expression of a senior politician.

Millett has complained about things Corbyn said in a BBC television interview with broadcaster Andrew Marr in September 2018.

He says Corbyn defamed him by accusing him of being “disruptive and abusive” at a 2013 meeting featuring a Palestinian speaker.

Corbyn, who says he was defending himself against charges of antisemitism, disputes Millett’s claims and denies defaming him.

Justice Saini made preliminary decisions about the meaning of words Corbyn used – and about whether he was stating facts or expressing opinion – in July following a High Court hearing.

Lawyers representing Millett argued the allegations were “factual” while lawyers representing Corbyn argued the “words conveyed a statement of opinion”.

Richard Millett

The judge concluded that Corbyn was making “factual” allegations “as to Millett’s behaviour”.

Lawyers representing Millett argued that to accuse someone of being “disruptive and abusive to the degree in issue” must have “caused him to have been defamed”.

Lawyers representing Corbyn disagreed and argued what had been said did not lower Millett in the “estimation of right-thinking people”.

Justice Saini concluded the “words complained of” referred to Millett and “bore a meaning defamatory of Millett”.

He said what had been stated suggested “conduct falling below the standards expected of citizens in modern British society”.

Anthony Hudson QC, who is representing Corbyn, told Sir Geoffrey Vos, the Master of the Rolls, Dame Victoria Sharp, president of the Queen’s Bench Division of the High Court, and Lord Justice Warby that the case involved political and free speech, and required close scrutiny.

“This appeal raises important and serious issues about the right to freedom of expression of a senior politician in the context of discussion about a highly-charged and sensitive political issue, and in circumstances where he was defending himself against grave charges of antisemitism,” said Hudson, in a written case outline.

Jeremy Corbyn and his wife Laura Alvarez leaving the High Court in London where the former Labour leader is trying to overturn a High Court judge’s ruling after being sued for defamation by a political blogger. Mr Corbyn has mounted an appeal against preliminary findings made by Mr Justice Saini. Picture date: Tuesday March 16, 2021.

“By his ruling, the judge has, amongst other things, denied Corbyn the opportunity to rely on a statutory defence to a claim for libel which is fundamental to the protection of political speech, viz, the defence of honest opinion.

“The judge also erred in holding that statements which plainly did not meet the necessary seriousness threshold were defamatory at common law.”

He said Justice Saini’s decisions amounted to a “serious interference” with Corbyn’s human right to free speech.

Lawyers representing Millett said Corbyn’s appeal should be dismissed.

Judges have heard that, shortly after the meeting involving the Palestinian speaker, Corbyn, who had not yet become the Labour leader, had addressed a conference organised by the Palestinian Return Centre.

Corbyn had said “the Zionists” who had attended the meeting had “berated” the Palestinian speaker.

He had said these “Zionists” did not want to study history and did not understand English irony.

In August 2018, when Corbyn had become leader of the Labour Party, a video of that “irony speech” was made public.

Lawyers representing Millett said there had subsequently been “huge publicity” about “the fact that” Corbyn’s statements during the irony speech had been directed at Millett.

Marr had then asked Corbyn about the “irony speech”, during an interview on The Andrew Marr Show, in September 2018.

Judges have heard how Corbyn had told Marr that he had not been “antisemitic”.

He said two people had been “incredibly disruptive” and he had accused them of not understanding English irony, because he wanted to defend the Palestinian speaker.

Millett says people who had read media articles saying statements Corbyn made during the “irony speech” were directed at him, and would have realised that the Labour leader was referring to him when telling Marr about “two people” who had been “incredibly disruptive”.

Support your Jewish community. Support your Jewish News

Thank you for helping to make Jewish News the leading source of news and opinion for the UK Jewish community. Today we're asking for your invaluable help to continue putting our community first in everything we do.

Unlike other Jewish media, we do not charge for content. That won’t change. Because we are free, we rely on advertising to cover our costs. This vital lifeline, which has dropped in recent years, has fallen further due to coronavirus.

For as little as £5 a month you can help sustain the vital work we do in celebrating and standing up for Jewish life in Britain.

Jewish News holds our community together and keeps us connected. Like a synagogue, it’s where people turn to feel part of something bigger. It also proudly shows the rest of Britain the vibrancy and rich culture of modern Jewish life.

You can make a quick and easy one-off or monthly contribution of £5, £10, £20 or any other sum you’re comfortable with.

100% of your donation will help us continue celebrating our community, in all its dynamic diversity...

Engaging

Being a community platform means so much more than producing a newspaper and website. One of our proudest roles is media partnering with our invaluable charities to amplify the outstanding work they do to help us all.

Celebrating

There’s no shortage of oys in the world but Jewish News takes every opportunity to celebrate the joys too, through projects like Night of Heroes, 40 Under 40 and other compelling countdowns that make the community kvell with pride.

Pioneering

In the first collaboration between media outlets from different faiths, Jewish News worked with British Muslim TV and Church Times to produce a list of young activists leading the way on interfaith understanding.

Campaigning

Royal Mail issued a stamp honouring Holocaust hero Sir Nicholas Winton after a Jewish News campaign attracted more than 100,000 backers. Jewish News also produces special editions of the paper highlighting pressing issues including mental health and Holocaust remembrance.

Easy access

In an age when news is readily accessible, Jewish News provides high-quality content free online and offline, removing any financial barriers to connecting people.

Voice of our community to wider society

The Jewish News team regularly appears on TV, radio and on the pages of the national press to comment on stories about the Jewish community. Easy access to the paper on the streets of London also means Jewish News provides an invaluable window into the community for the country at large.

We hope you agree all this is worth preserving.

read more:
comments